Write an analytical or argumentative essay on a topic from the list of options below, avoiding plot summary (see nugget 1) and meeting each of the following requirements. Read each of these requirements very carefully, more than once.

• 6-8 pages in length, 1800 words minimum, 2500 words maximum (in the body of the essay, excluding headers, name, date, title, works cited entries, etc.).
  
  
• Your work must be formatted carefully and correctly, following MLA guidelines as outlined on my "simple stuff" web page. Papers not following these very simple conventions of formatting will be returned un-graded and will receive late penalties depending upon how many days it takes you to format them correctly.
  
  
• A minimum of ten quotations from the novel or novels you examine is required: ten is an absolute minimum—you may certainly offer more than ten to illustrate or substantiate your primary claims thoroughly and effectively.
  
  
• All quotations and other source material must be documented according to MLA guidelines as outlined on my "quotes and documentation" page. A works cited page is mandatory even if you cite only one novel.
  
  
• You are not required to incorporate research into this paper as you will be with paper 2, but you may if you wish bring in quotations and other support from secondary sources of legitimate scholarly criticism or commentary so long as you do not get your “research” from the world wide web. In fact, you should most emphatically not consult any world wide web pages outside of our course materials while preparing your paper.
  
  
• Note that you must submit the final draft in both hard copy (printed on paper) and electronic form as an email attachment sent to chip@chipspage.com.
  
  
• Paper proposals: as a graded assignment, you are to turn in a paper proposal in the form of a topic sentence outline beginning with the question your essay will strive to answer, followed by each body paragraph's complete topic sentence as it will appear in the essay itself, and ending with a thesis statement that a) answers the question you are addressing, and b) ties together the primary points in your topic sentences. The question you raise for this outline should be a literal question—an interrogative sentence ending in a question mark, not merely a statement of what your topic is. You may submit your topic sentence outline early in the body of an email message—that is, it’s not necessary to send the outline as an attachment. For full explanation of a topic sentence outline, including examples, see the paper proposal assignment page.

Topic Options:
Note that in all options below you are restricted only to novels we have read for this course. Comparisons or other significant concentration on novels we have not read is off-limits for this assignment.

• Examination of the social norms or expected behaviors according to sex or gender as established in any two of the novels we've read thus far: Moll Flanders, Pride and Prejudice, and Bleak House. Note that you must focus on norms or expectations for both male and female behavior. To reiterate, the focus here is on behavior expected of men, as men, and women, as women, as demonstrated in any two of these novels.
  
  
• In-depth examination of psychological realism in any three or four characters from the novels we've read thus far: Moll Flanders, Pride and Prejudice, and Bleak House. Explain what makes the authors' portrayal of these characters convincingly credible or realistic.
  
  
• Defoe's conflicting impulses in Moll Flanders: moral instruction vs. titillation; preaching morality vs. gaining a wide audience for his book.
  
  
• Austen's use of satire in Pride and Prejudice: her mockery of social or human foibles, flaws, weaknesses, etc.
  
  
• Dickens's tendencies to melodrama or sentimentality in Bleak House.
  
  
• Dickens's methods of exaggeration for purposes of humor in Bleak House.
  
  
• The evolution of narrative discourse (authorial intrusion) as represented in Moll Flanders and in the third-person Bleak House narrative.
  
  
• Social criticism in Moll Flanders or in Bleak House: the authors' commentary on flaws or ills in society in need of correction or improvement.
  
  
• The "Esther Summerson problem," considering both sides of the debate over Esther's credibility as female narrator and protagonist: true-to-life and credible, or overdone and unconvincing.
  
  

I encourage you to seek my help with your paper outside of class. If my office hours don't mesh with your schedule, let me know, and we'll make other arrangements.

---

Tips:

• Offer concrete evidence (i.e. quotations) to support every one of your major assertions.
• Make every body ¶'s topic sentence answer the topic sentence outline question directly.
• Avoid plot summary: see nugget 1; introduce all quotes: see nugget 3.
• Sweat the details: see the "Golden Rules," "Nuggets," "Simple Stuff," and "Quotes & Documentation" pages and proofread carefully.